Murphy Paulson & Murphy: Trampe Philip Z

It has been over four years since my divorce, and there is no doubt that I was misrepresented. In a subsequent case, the judge suggested I look into malpractice. My ex listed substantial income from the sale of a business(one I worked at etc), under ASSETS on his financial disclosure. A competent attorney would have challenged that and had the quarterly payments accurately placed under INCOME. This would have opened it up for alimony and child support. Not only did he not do this, attorney Trampe also did not inform me that I had a claim to half of that asset. I have been sick over this as it totaled at least half a million. Apparently giving up my career, taking care of my family and my children, and my ex running off with a mistress was not enough for Mr. Trample to adequately represent me and my children. I paid handsomely for an attorney to represent my interests, not the interest of my ex-husband. I am left with the conviction that I would have been better off with no representation at all. Going before a judge would have probably gotten me half of everything which is the way it should be after a long-term marriage with children, as well as commingling of all assets including inheritance. All I can say, is you better do it right the first time.

Attorney Trampe has been amazing! Even 8 years after my divorce and another custody battle his council has never let me down!

Listening to whiter shade of pale

Joke!